Plata v. Newsom

Case Summary

In 2001, the Prison Law Office filed a federal class action lawsuit on behalf of every person incarcerated in CDCR who has a serious medical condition, because there were serious problems with medical care at every CDCR prison. In 2002, the federal court in the Plata case ordered CDCR to make major changes to medical care, and required that it follow specific written policies and procedures (links to current medical care rules and policies are below). In 2005, the federal court in Plata found that CDCR could not improve medical care on its own, and the court appointed an independent Receiver with authority over CDCR medical care. In 2009, a three-judge federal court determined that CDCR would be unable to provide constitutionally adequate health care so long as the prisons were grossly overcrowded, and ordered CDCR to reduce crowding statewide. In 2011, that order was affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court. In 2015, the court ordered the Receiver to consider returning control of medical care at each prison back to CDCR; as of May 2025, the Receiver has done so for all except about five prisons, while retaining overall authority for care. We continue to monitor medical care in CDCR and advocate regarding issues both for individuals and systemically.

Timeline

April 2001 Incarcerated people sue California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) for its failure to provide constitutionally adequate medical care.
June 2002 Parties agree to injunctive relief, requiring CDCR to provide the level of medical care required under the Eighth Amendment.
May 2005 Judge Henderson finds "the California prison medical care system is broken beyond repair" and imposes a receivership over medical care.
October 2006 Governor Schwarzenegger issues "Prison Overcrowding State of Emergency Proclamation" based on severe overcrowding in 29 out of 33 prisons.
November 2006 Plaintiffs move to convene a three-judge district court panel to address severe overcrowding in California prisons.
July 2007 Three-judge panel convenes.
March 2009 CDCR's request to terminate the receivership is denied; Court finds the Receivership complies with the PLRA.
August 2009 Three-judge panel finds "crowding is the primary cause of the state’s unconstitutional failure to provide adequate medical and mental health care" and orders CDCR to reduce the prison population to 137.5% of design capacity.
May 2011 Supreme Court affirms the three-judge panel decision regarding population reduction.
April 2013 Three-judge panel denies CDCR's request to vacate the population reduction order and threatens contempt if CDCR does not act to comply with the order.
June 2013 Plaintiffs' request for relief related to Valley Fever is granted. Strict requirements are placed on who can be housed at two specific prisons.
February 2015 CDCR meets the 137.5% population benchmark.
January 2020 CDCR begins to implement the Integrated Substance Use Disorder Treatment (ISUDT) Program. As of early 2024, about 17,000 people in CDCR were receiving medication-assisted treatment through the ISUDT program.
March - April 2020 COVID hits California prisons. Plaintiffs file an emergency request with the three-judge court for population reduction in response to COVID; three-judge court denies Plaintiffs' request for emergency relief. Plaintiffs request emergency relief related to COVID at the district court level; that request is also denied.
September 2021 - April 2022 District court issues order mandating COVID vaccinations for CDCR staff, and the Ninth Circuit vacates the vaccination order.
June 2025 CDCR remains in Receivership. As of the end of May 2025, 29 prisons (including three that are now closed) have been delegated. Five remain under the Receiver's control.